George McGovern urges pullout from Iraq this year
The
former U.S. senator admires Obama but is puzzled by his adoption of the
Bush administration's policy of dragging out the withdrawal of troops
from Iraq.
By George S. McGovern
April 20, 2009
President Obama holds my admiration with high hopes for his
message of change in Washington. It is puzzling, however, that he has
adopted most of the previous administration's formula for dragging out
the withdrawal of our troops from the mistaken war in Iraq for nearly
three more years. Very little "change" here.
Three years ago,
public opinion polls indicated that a majority of Americans believed
our policymakers were wrong in ordering troops into Iraq. It is widely
accepted that this sentiment more than any other factor in the 2006
congressional elections resulted in Democratic majorities in both the
House and Senate.
Are we now going to ignore for another three
years the public mandate of 2006 against this costly, preemptive war
based on deceit? And how can we justify putting thousands more U.S.
troops into Afghanistan? We have already exhausted our treasury. We are
also close to exhausting our soldiers.
Can there be any doubt
that the enormous war cost has contributed to the financial crisis here
at home? The expense of waging two Middle East wars, plus the loss of
revenue caused by the previous administration's tax cuts, have
skyrocketed the national debt to a record high. Do we ever consider
what the interest alone is on our $10-trillion national debt -- much of
it paid to China?
Frankly, we cannot afford a two-war
commitment year after year if we want to balance the federal budget and
restore our economy. The huge bonuses that directors of failing
corporations have awarded themselves and their chief executives have
rightfully angered people, but those figures are peanuts compared with
the $12 billion a month we have poured into Iraq and Afghanistan over
the last six years.
Has either the great God above or his
creatures here below designated us to run the Middle East? What do we
say to the Iraqi people who have indicated overwhelmingly in several
polls that they want U.S. troops out of their country now? Why would we
not understand this sentiment considering that our military equipment
has smashed Iraqi homes, public buildings and infrastructure, including
electricity and running water?
Of course, the most painful
cost of these wars is the deaths of more than 4,200 brave American
troops and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians. This is to say nothing
of the decline of our political judgment and moral standing in the
world.
The Obama administration recommends we leave 50,000
troops in Iraq to "police" that troubled country through 2011. There
may well be flare-ups that will keep them there indefinitely,
struggling to police the war-induced chaos.
In June 1950,
President Truman ordered our troops into Korea, stating it would only
be a brief police action that did not require a declaration of war.
Three years later and after 38,000 American soldiers had been killed,
the new American president, Dwight D. Eisenhower, the commander of
Allied forces in World War II, promptly ended our involvement in the
Korean War, to the relief of our combat soldiers and the American
public.
Unfortunately, Washington left 40,000 American soldiers
behind to police the 38th Parallel -- for a brief time. Yet, more than
50 years later, nearly 30,000 American troops are still in South Korea.
So much for brief police actions.
Our policymakers in Washington
contend that we must maintain U.S. troops in the Middle East to curb
terrorism. I strongly believe that it is our military presence in Iraq,
Afghanistan and elsewhere in the Middle East that is driving terrorism
against the United States. No country that longs for national
sovereignty wants a foreign army in its midst. We taught that lesson to
the British Empire in 1776 when George Washington and his ragtag
guerrilla army drove the British military from our shores.
My
generation has lived through half a dozen wars, beginning with World
War II and then Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and several smaller conflicts. The
only one of those wars I really believed in and still do was the U.S.
participation in World War II, in which I served as a combat bomber
pilot against Hitler's Nazi Germany.
I believe we aging veterans
have an obligation to share what we have learned with the American
people and with our young president, who seems open to well-meant
suggestions.
In that spirit, I urge President Obama to bring
our troops home from the Middle East this year. A good target date for
completing an orderly withdrawal from two ill-conceived and costly wars
in Iraq and Afghanistan would be Thanksgiving 2009.
For our sake and God's sake, let's get out of there and begin healing
our own bankrupted land.
Copyright 2009 Los Angeles Times