Cyber-attack on Defense Department computers raises concerns
The
'malware' strike, thought to be from inside Russia, hit combat zone
computers and the U.S. Central Command overseeing Iraq and Afghanistan.
The attack underscores concerns about computer warfare.
By Julian E. Barnes
November 28, 2008
Reporting from Washington —
Senior military leaders took the exceptional step of briefing President
Bush this week on a severe and widespread electronic attack on Defense
Department computers that may have originated in Russia -- an incursion
that posed unusual concern among commanders and raised potential
implications for national security.
Defense
officials would not describe the extent of damage inflicted on military
networks. But they said that the attack struck hard at networks within
U.S. Central Command, the headquarters that oversees U.S. involvement
in Iraq and Afghanistan, and affected computers in combat zones. The
attack also penetrated at least one highly protected classified network.
Military
computers are regularly beset by outside hackers, computer viruses and
worms. But defense officials said the most recent attack involved an
intrusive piece of malicious software, or "malware," apparently
designed specifically to target military networks.
"This one was
significant; this one got our attention," said one defense official,
speaking on condition of anonymity when discussing internal assessments.
Although
officials are withholding many details, the attack underscores the
increasing danger and potential significance of computer warfare, which
defense experts say could one day be used by combatants to undermine
even a militarily superior adversary.
Bush was briefed on the
threat by Navy Adm. Michael G. Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff. Mullen also briefed Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates.
Military
electronics experts have not pinpointed the source or motive of the
attack and could not say whether the destructive program was created by
an individual hacker or whether the Russian government may have had
some involvement. Defense experts may never be able to answer such
questions, officials said.
The defense official said the
military also had not learned whether the software's designers may have
been specifically targeting computers used by troops in Afghanistan and
Iraq.
However, suspicions of Russian involvement come at an
especially delicate time because of sagging relations between
Washington and Moscow and growing tension over U.S. plans to develop a
missile defense system in Eastern Europe. The two governments also have
traded charges of regional meddling after U.S. support for democratic
elections in former Soviet states and recent Russian overtures in Latin
America.
U.S. officials have worried in recent years about the
possibility of cyber-attacks from other countries, especially China and
Russia, whether sponsored by governments of those countries or launched
by individual computer experts.
An electronic attack from
Russia shut down government computers in Estonia in 2007. And officials
believe that a series of electronic attacks were launched against
Georgia at the same time that hostilities erupted between Moscow and
Tbilisi last summer. Russia has denied official involvement in the
Georgia attacks.
The first indication that the Pentagon was
dealing with a computer problem came last week, when officials banned
the use of external computer flash drives. At the time, officials did
not indicate the extent of the attack or the fact that it may have
targeted defense systems or posed national security concerns.
The
invasive software, known as agent.btz, has circulated among
nongovernmental U.S. computers for months. But only recently has it
affected the Pentagon's networks. It is not clear whether the version
responsible for the cyber-intrusion of classified networks is the same
as the one affecting other computer systems.
The malware is able
to spread to any flash drive plugged into an infected computer. The
risk of spreading the malware to other networks prompted the military
to ban the drives.
Defense officials acknowledged that the
worldwide ban on external drives was a drastic move. Flash drives are
used constantly in Iraq and Afghanistan, and many officers keep them
loaded with crucial information on lanyards around their necks.
Banning
their use made sharing information in the war theaters more difficult
and reflected the severity of the intrusion and the threat from
agent.btz, a second official said.
Officials would not describe
the exact threat from agent.btz, or say whether it could shut down
computers or steal information. Some computer experts have reported
that agent.btz can allow an attacker to take control of a computer
remotely and to take files and other information from it.
In
response to the attack, the U.S. Strategic Command, which oversees the
military's cyberspace defenses, has raised the security level for its
so-called information operations condition, or "INFOCON," initiating
enhanced security measures on military networks.
The growing
possibility of future electronic conflicts has touched off debates
among U.S. defense experts over how to train and utilize American
computer warfare specialists. Some have advocated creating offensive
capabilities, allowing the U.S. to develop the ability to intrude into
the networks of other countries.
But most top leaders believe
the U.S. emphasis in cyberspace should be on improving defenses and
gathering intelligence, particularly about potential threats.
On
Tuesday, Gen. Norton A. Schwartz, Air Force chief of staff, received a
specialized briefing about the malware attack. Officers from the Air
Force Network Operations Center at Barksdale Air Force Base in
Louisiana outlined their efforts to halt the spread of the malware and
to protect military computers from further attack.
Schwartz,
praising those efforts, said that the attack and the military's
response were being closely monitored by senior military leaders.
The
offending program has been cleansed from a number of military networks.
But officials said they did not believe they had removed every bit of
infection from all Defense Department computers.
"There are lots
of people working hard to remove the threat and put in preventive
measures to protect the grid," said the defense official. "We have
taken a number of corrective measures, but I would be overstating it if
I said we were through this."
Barnes is a writer in our Washington bureau.
Copyright 2008 Los Angeles Times