A TIME OF TRANSITION
Civil liberties groups have a wish list for Obama
Rolling
back Bush's counter-terrorism policies is a priority, as are closing
the Guantanamo prison, stopping military tribunals and curtailing
domestic surveillance.
By James Oliphant
November 20, 2008
Reporting from Washington —
It's called the president's daily brief, or, more informally, the
"threat matrix." And it could change the way President-elect Barack
Obama views the world and the dangers that exist.
Obama began receiving daily intelligence reports -- the ones given to
President Bush -- after the election. They provide a far more detailed
look at terrorist threats than he received as a senator or presidential
candidate.
"If ever there were proof of the existence of evil in the world, it is
in the pages of these reports," former Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft once
said about the briefings.
Obama and his national security advisors will probably keep those
reports in mind as they consider changes to the Bush administration's
counter-terrorism policies. Civil liberties groups and others have
compiled a wish list of sorts, seeking the repudiation of controversial
tactics such as domestic surveillance, extended detention, "enhanced"
interrogation and "extraordinary rendition."
"This administration got a chance to make all its own rules," said
Annemarie Brennan of Amnesty International USA.
Now it's Obama's turn. But tempering his desire to close the book on an
administration that has been accused of violating domestic and
international law will be the need to ensure the nation remains
protected.
Obama must decide whether to dismantle the legal framework that the
Bush administration created after the Sept. 11 attacks, when the White
House, Pentagon and Justice Department determined that existing legal
processes, both civilian and military, were inadequate to meet the
threat posed by terrorism.
Specifically, human rights and civil liberties groups are pushing for
the Obama administration to do the following:
* Close the prison at the U.S. naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Obama has repeatedly expressed his desire to do so. But before that can
happen, his administration must review the basis for holding each of
the remaining 250 detainees, and decide who should be released, who
should be transferred to the U.S. for trial, or whether to continue to
hold some indefinitely.
* Dismantle the military commission process for trying accused
terrorists and try them in U.S. federal courts. That would present
formidable legal issues involving the use of classified information, as
well as evidence obtained through possibly illegal interrogation
techniques.
* Issue an executive order that ends so-called extraordinary rendition
-- the practice of sending an alleged terrorist to another country to
be held and questioned -- and revokes a 2007 order that reauthorized
the CIA's detention and interrogation program.
* Issue an order that a single standard be used in interrogating
terrorism suspects. The military is bound by restrictions that forbid
coercive and extreme methods, but the intelligence services are not.
* Scale back amendments passed this year to the federal law that
governs the surveillance of foreign agents, and which provided
retroactive immunity from lawsuits to the nation's largest
telecommunications companies. Obama supported the amendments but also
opposed granting immunity. Until now, he probably did not know the
extent to which the surveillance program has provided valuable
information.
* Conduct a formal review of Bush administration legal policy and
decisions made on interrogation and detention. The White House has been
reluctant to make public memos and other papers documenting its
conclusions that all of its anti-terrorism programs were within the law.
Oliphant is a writer in our Washington bureau.
Copyright 2008 Los Angeles Times