U.S. troops in eastern Afghanistan won't rest for winter
Forces will continue pursuing extremists in
the east despite the brutal weather, says Gen. David McKiernan.
By Julian E. Barnes
November 19, 2008
Reporting from Washington —
U.S. troops in Afghanistan will continue pursuing extremists in the
eastern part of the country over the brutal winter months, but lack the
forces in southern areas to mount the same offensive, the top U.S.
commander there said Tuesday.
U.S.
efforts in eastern Afghanistan could be helped by pressure on extremist
groups from Pakistan, said Gen. David D. McKiernan, the U.S. and NATO
commander. But U.S. and allied commanders in the south must await the
arrival of extra troops sought by McKiernan. Southern Afghanistan
includes Helmand province and the city of Kandahar, traditional areas
of greater Taliban strength.
In an address to the Atlantic
Council of the United States think tank in Washington, McKiernan said
that his standing request for about 20,000 additional troops would be
approved -- "hopefully quickly" -- by U.S. officials. McKiernan is
seeking combat brigades, aviation support and logistics specialists.
One brigade already approved is scheduled to arrive by February.
McKiernan
acknowledged that Afghanistan has been a secondary effort for the
military, after Iraq. But he said that could change next year. "We have
perhaps a window of opportunity to apply more resources," McKiernan
said.
In eastern areas, Pakistan's efforts to prevent extremists
from escaping into that country could help a U.S. offensive, McKiernan
said.
"We are going to try to . . . eliminate insurgent groups
on the Afghan side throughout the winter," McKiernan said. "We are not
going to lower our tempo of operations." In past years of the war,
fighting has slowed during the cold weather.
However, the
pressure from Pakistan also could result in a rise in violence as
extremists become squeezed between U.S. and Pakistani forces, said Col.
John Spiszer, the commander of the 3rd Brigade of the 1st Infantry
Division.
Spiszer said more forces would enable him to do more
along the border. "I think we are making great progress, but there are
just too few of us," he said, speaking to reporters separately via
teleconference from Afghanistan.
There now are more than 30,000
U.S. troops in Afghanistan, along with a roughly equal number from
other North Atlantic Treaty Organization member nations.
McKiernan
emphasized that political accommodation and reconciliation among Afghan
tribes and forces would be a key to eventual stability. But additional
troops will speed progress, he said.
He cautioned against transferring strategies from Iraq to Afghanistan,
which is a different conflict, he said.
Nonetheless,
commanders in Afghanistan are examining the local reconciliation
efforts in Iraq that helped craft peace deals with ethnic groups, such
as the Sunni Arabs' so-called Awakening Councils. Their application in
Afghanistan would be different, he said.
Instead of tribal-based efforts, McKiernan said he prefers
district-based programs to connect tribes and clerics.
Barnes is a writer in our Washington bureau.
Copyright 2008 Los Angeles Times