From the Los Angeles Times
Karzai assassination attempt shakes Afghanistan
The
brazen attack at a public ceremony attended by local and foreign
dignitaries raises questions about security despite a boost in
international and Afghan troop strength.
By M. Karim Faiez and Henry Chu
Special to The Times
April 28, 2008
KABUL, AFGHANISTAN —
The attempted assassination Sunday of President Hamid Karzai deepened
fears that Islamic militants remain able to penetrate the defenses of
security forces here despite a boost in international and Afghan troop
strength.
Karzai
escaped unhurt after gunfire erupted at a public ceremony attended by
him and a number of local and foreign dignitaries, including the U.S.
ambassador, who also was unharmed. But the brazen attack, mounted from
fairly close range, has raised questions about the effectiveness of
measures to beef up security in this troubled capital before an
expected "spring offensive" by the Taliban insurgency.
Three
people were killed in the assault -- a member of parliament, a tribal
chief and a young boy. Officials said about 10 others were wounded,
including another lawmaker.
It was the second high-profile
attack in Kabul this year. In a well-orchestrated January assault,
militants shot their way past security guards and blast walls at the
city's only five-star hotel, an establishment frequented by Afghan
officials and high-powered foreign visitors. Several people were killed.
A
spokesman for the Taliban immediately claimed responsibility for the
attempt on Karzai's life and said that three of six Taliban fighters
were killed in the incident. Later in the day, a second Islamic group,
headed by notorious militant leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, also said it
had carried out the attack, according to Afghan television.
Whoever
the gunmen were, they were able to open fire and launch rockets from a
building only a few hundred yards from where Karzai, the American and
British ambassadors, and other VIPs had gathered Sunday morning to
observe a commemoration of the victory by Afghan fighters over the
Soviet forces occupying their country.
Authorities had tightened
security in Kabul for several days before the event, posting
plainclothes officers throughout the city and setting up vehicle
checkpoints. Soldiers in tanks and armored cars were deployed at the
parade grounds, which sit near the presidential palace.
The
national anthem had just ended when a sudden fusillade of automatic
gunfire sent hundreds of attendees scurrying for cover. Bodyguards
quickly hustled Karzai into a car. A live television broadcast of the
event showed a lawmaker slumped in his seat and another sprawled on the
ground not far from where the Afghan president had been sitting.
The
British ambassador to Afghanistan, Sherard Cowper-Coles, told Reuters
that he had been standing on the dais next to William Wood, the U.S.
ambassador, when the shots rang out.
"It was coming to the end
of the 21-gun salute. I saw an explosion and a puff of dust to the left
of the parade and then heard the crackle of small-arms fire from all
directions," Cowper-Coles said. "After some hesitation, my bodyguard
frog-marched me away."
A military officer at the scene who
declined to give his name said that after the shooting, security forces
raided a three-story building, possibly a hotel, near the parade
grounds. He said that three suspects had been killed and nine others
arrested.
A Taliban spokesman told Reuters that the attack
proved that insurgents "not only have the ability to operate in the
provinces, but even in Kabul. . . . Karzai and his Cabinet can't be
safe from Taliban attacks."
For years after the Taliban was
ousted in 2001, Kabul had been considered relatively insulated from the
violence besetting other parts of the country, especially the south and
the east, where the group's resurgence has been the strongest. But
suicide attacks have become frequent occurrences.
At the same
time that they are preparing for a possible "spring offensive" by
militants, U.S. and international forces stationed in Afghanistan have
asserted that the Taliban has been severely weakened. Sunday's attack,
at a high-profile event in the heart of Kabul, was as much a symbolic
as tactical strike at that claim.
George Varughese of the Asia
Foundation's Kabul office said it was still too early to say with
certainty who was behind the assault. But "whenever there are
high-visibility events or high-value targets, to be able to demonstrate
any ability to penetrate or to disturb . . . is probably the
[attackers'] intent more than anything else -- to show that they can,"
Varughese said.
He added that the attack demonstrated that "it's
not enough to militarily counter anti-government activities. You've got
to have a political answer to all of this."
Karzai has expressed
a willingness to talk to the Taliban as long as the group renounces
violence and agrees to honor Afghanistan's Constitution.
He has
survived several previous assassination attempts since becoming
president after the fall of the Taliban. Within hours of the latest
attack, Karzai went on national television to appeal for calm, blaming
the assault on "enemies of Afghanistan" and saying that the Afghan
military had already arrested suspects.
Karzai is up for reelection next year. Security is likely to be a major
issue in the election.
Copyright 2008 Los Angeles Times