From the Los Angeles Times
Gap opens between Al Qaeda and allies
A backlash builds over the network's tactics,
including suicide attacks. Its leaders try to defuse the anger.
By Josh Meyer
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
April 24, 2008
WASHINGTON —
Al Qaeda increasingly faces sharp criticism from once-loyal
sympathizers who openly question its ideology and tactics, including
attacks that kill innocent Muslims, according to U.S. intelligence
officials, counter-terrorism experts and the group's own communications.
A litany of complaints target Osama bin Laden's network and its
affiliates for their actions in Iraq and North Africa, emphasis on
suicide bombings instead of political action and tepid support for, or
outright antagonism toward, militant groups pressing the Palestinian
cause.
The criticism apparently has grown serious enough that Al Qaeda's chief
strategist, Ayman Zawahiri, felt compelled to solicit online questions.
He responded in an audio message released this month. For more than 90
minutes, Bin Laden's second-in-command tried to defuse the anger.
In March, Zawahiri released a 188-page Internet book to rebut
complaints, particularly those of an influential former Islamic
militant who said Zawahiri and Bin Laden should be held accountable for
violence against Muslims.
Sayyed Imam Sharif, an Egyptian physician who once was a senior
theologian for Al Qaeda, was one of Zawahiri's oldest associates. The
author of violent manifestoes over the last two decades, Sharif did an
about-face while incarcerated in Egypt. Several other prominent Muslim
clerics and former militants have similarly condemned Al Qaeda.
Such rifts have been emerging for several years, but they have become
increasingly contentious lately, in cyberspace and on the streets of
some Arab countries. In addition to Zawahiri, Al Qaeda leaders,
including Bin Laden himself, have gone on a public relations offensive.
In October, Bin Laden asked followers for forgiveness for the deaths of
civilians in Iraq.
Analysts with U.S. and allied intelligence agencies differ over whether
the backlash poses significant risks for Al Qaeda, or whether it is
simply a public relations problem. The organization is expanding its
pool of hard-core recruits, according to one U.S. counter- terrorism
official. And Internet communications and other intelligence have shown
that its anti-American message continues to resonate with extremists
throughout much of the Islamic world.
But Al Qaeda also has sought to use regional groups to become more
mainstream and expand its power base. It is in these groups that most
of the conflict is occurring.
"We know that all of this matters to Al Qaeda and that its senior
leadership is sensitive to the perceived legitimacy of both their
actions and their ideology," Juan Carlos Zarate, the White House's
deputy national security advisor for combating terrorism, said in a
speech Wednesday at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
"They care about their image because it has real-world effects on
recruitment, donations and support in Muslim and religious communities
for the Al Qaeda message."
Some counter-terrorism experts say they suspect that some criticism may
have been planted on websites by Western intelligence agents, or lodged
by imprisoned radicals who have been coerced.
But Zarate and others say the dissent is real and widespread.
"There has been a growing rejection of the Al Qaeda program and
message," said Zarate, who added that the U.S. and its allies have
encouraged the backlash by exploiting rifts between Al Qaeda and
once-supportive Islamic fundamentalists objecting to its tactics.
U.S. officials cite a variety of evidence, including intelligence,
Internet traffic, statements from Al Qaeda leaders, polling data and
even songs by popular Pakistani and Indonesian musicians.
Prominent Saudi cleric Salman Awdah sent an open letter to Bin Laden in
September in which he condemned violence against innocents and said Al
Qaeda was hurting Muslim charities by its purported ties to them.
"Brother Osama, how much blood has been spilled?" wrote Awdah, who is
believed to be independent of the Saudi government. "How many innocents
among children, elderly, the weak and women have been killed and made
homeless in the name of Al Qaeda?"
"Who benefits from turning countries like Morocco, Algeria, Lebanon or
Saudi Arabia into places where fear spreads and no one can feel safe?"
In London this week, former extremists launched the Quilliam
Foundation, an organization dedicated to discrediting Al Qaeda and
other Islamic extremists.
Zawahiri described his audio message as the first of several "open
meetings" and answered complaints, many of them asking why Al Qaeda had
killed innocents, including students on a passing bus who died in a
bomb attack on the Algerian Constitutional Council in December.
"Excuse me, Mr. Zawahiri, but who is it who is killing with Your
Excellency's blessing the innocents in Baghdad, Morocco and Algeria? Do
you consider the killing of women and children to be jihad?" asked one
questioner whom Zawahiri identified as a geography teacher.
"Were we insane killers of innocents as the questioner claims, it would
be possible for us to kill thousands of them in the crowded markets,"
Zawahiri responded. The deaths of any innocents were the result of
"unintentional error or out of necessity. . . . The enemy intentionally
takes up positions in the midst of the Muslims for them to be human
shields for him."
Others asked about Al Qaeda's legal authority, and questioned why
Zawahiri criticizes the militant groups Hamas and Hezbollah, which are
fighting Israel, for their participation in politics.
Zawahiri's often-rambling explanations referred listeners to his
recently released book, "The Exoneration," which primarily rebuts
statements by Sharif, whom Zawahiri suggests was coerced into
criticizing Al Qaeda. Sharif denies that.
Such criticism ultimately could undermine Al Qaeda, said Frank
Cilluffo, a former White House counter-terrorism official who is
director of the Homeland Security Policy Institute at George Washington
University.
"It has raised the bar in using violence to achieve its objectives, and
people are starting to ask a lot of hard questions. It is losing
popular support," he said. "It is occurring within the strategic
thinkers, but also among the rank and file."
Some of the earliest manifestations of the dissent were in Iraq. The
first leader of Al Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Musab Zarqawi, killed so many
Shiite and Sunni Muslims that a 2005 letter allegedly from Zawahiri
told him to stop.
The violence continued after Zarqawi was killed by U.S. forces in 2006,
and angry Sunnis were driven to form councils of neighborhood
volunteers with U.S. support to counter the foreign fighters that
helped make up Al Qaeda in Iraq.
In North Africa, some radicals have rebelled against a merger with Bin
Laden's network, objecting to the wave of suicide bombings that have
killed women and children since last April, as well as to efforts to
send the group's young men to Iraq.
Several prominent members of the Al Qaeda affiliate, including regional
commander Benmessaoud Abdelkader, have charged that suicide bombings
serve Al Qaeda's global ambitions at the expense of their efforts to
fight what they view as corrupt and anti-Islamist governments in
Algeria, Morocco and elsewhere in North Africa.
Olivier Guitta, a Washington-based counter-terrorism consultant born in
Morocco, said some militants have alerted authorities to impending bomb
attacks so they could be stopped. "They don't mind hitting the
government of Algeria, or France for supporting Algeria. But they do
not want their kids to go off and fight in Iraq against the Americans."
In Yemen, old guard Al Qaeda operatives have split with a newly
emerging generation of fighters in the last year over the younger
militants' violent tactics, starting with a suicide bombing in July
that killed seven Spanish tourists and two Yemenis.
In Pakistan, recent polls suggest that Bin Laden's popularity has
suffered because of the widespread belief that Al Qaeda has been behind
the killing of many Muslims there, including former Prime Minister
Benazir Bhutto.
Cilluffo said that on a recent trip to the Middle East he interviewed
fighters who had just returned from Iraq, many of them disillusioned.
"People are saying, 'I didn't sign up to kill fellow Muslims,' " he
said.
Fawaz Gerges, an author of two books on Islamic militants who has
spent the last several years interviewing militants, cited evidence of
"major fault lines" within Al Qaeda in chat rooms and other Internet
venues. "Bin Laden's statement and this one [from Zawahiri] really tell
us about the gravity of the crisis."
But several officials and experts suggested that Al Qaeda was mostly
trying to do a better job of reaching out to more mainstream recruits.
"Using this Q-and-A is a way to legitimize Al Qaeda and seek input and
increase their following, and not be seen as a hierarchical
organization that is divorced from its followers," said Farhana Ali, a
counter-terrorism analyst at Rand Corp. "This is an issue of survival.
They are trying to stay plugged in to Muslim opinion."
Copyright 2008 Los Angeles Times