From the Los Angeles Times
3rd Guantanamo detainee to boycott trial
The prisoner says that his only crime is
being Sudanese and that the 9/11 attacks exposed U.S. 'hypocrisy.'
By Carol J. Williams
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
April 11, 2008
GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA —
A Sudanese prisoner with long ties to Osama bin Laden told the
war-crimes tribunal here Thursday that the Sept. 11 attacks dealt heavy
blows to U.S. security and exposed the "hypocrisy" behind American
claims that it stands for equality and justice.
Appearing at his arraignment, Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud Qosi refused to
accept legal representation for his trial before the Pentagon's
military commissions.
After a rambling statement, he announced that he would boycott further
proceedings.
The bearded 47-year-old was the third Guantanamo defendant in the last
month to call the military tribunal illegitimate and refuse to
cooperate in his own defense.
"I leave in your hands the camel and its load for you to do whatever
you wish," he told Air Force Lt. Col. Nancy Paul, the judge preparing
for his trial on charges of conspiracy and material support for
terrorism.
Qosi also accused the U.S. military of discrimination against citizens
of the Third World, noting that two British detainees and an Australian
charged along with him four years ago have since been released under
pressure from those governments.
"The only war crime I committed and for which I'm being tried today
before you and which I admit having committed is, in truth, my
nationality," said the tall, slender Qosi. "My crime is that I'm a
Sudanese citizen."
A day earlier, Saudi prisoner Ahmed Muhammed Ahmed Haza Darbi deemed
the tribunal a "sham" and announced that he would boycott subsequent
sessions. On March 12, Afghan defendant Mohammed Jawad also rejected
the forum.
The succession of defendants refusing to cooperate with the tribunal
puts the onus on the U.S. government to "show that this is not a
complete sham," said Jamil Dakwar, a staff attorney with the American
Civil Liberties Union observing the arraignment.
He said Qosi's claim of nationality bias called into question "the
guarantee of equality before the law that is a hallmark of American
justice."
The chief prosecutor for the commissions, Army Col. Lawrence Morris,
said that he was concerned about the boycotts but that the government
remained committed to a just process.
Paul accepted Qosi's rejection of legal representation by Navy Cmdr.
Suzanne Lachelier or any other lawyer willing to submit to the
government's rules and practices.
Unlike U.S. federal courts, the Guantanamo tribunal permits
hearsay evidence as well as information gleaned from coercion and makes
no guarantee that the accused will be able to confront his accusers or
know all the evidence against him.
Qosi said he would act as his own attorney and insisted on reading a
statement.
Quoting an Al Jazeera analyst shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks, Qosi
said they dealt harsh blows to the United States "militarily,
economically, in security and spirit-wise."
He added that in his own view the attacks also hurt the United States
legally because, he said, they led the country to violate its standards
of human rights and justice.
"After the collapse of the towers, after the collapse of the Pentagon,
all these false masks fell away and your wrongs were exposed," Qosi
told the court. "The whole world has a headache from your hypocrisy."
Lachelier interrupted the defendant shortly after he began, urging the
judge to order a psychological evaluation. Paul cut Qosi off after a
few minutes, saying she feared he might be incriminating himself.
The defendant, who had been charged with a single count of conspiracy
under the previous military commissions system four years ago, was
cooperative with his defense team at that time but has twice refused to
meet with Lachelier, according to the guard force of the Joint Task
Force that runs the prisons.
Lachelier attempted to gain entrance to the facility where Qosi was
being held to hear him tell her directly that he didn't want to go over
his case.
"It is interfering with his right to counsel that we have to go through
his jailers" to communicate with him, Lachelier said, adding that she
was concerned Qosi had been threatened by guards not to accept legal
assistance.
When she got her first glimpse of Qosi a few minutes before Thursday's
arraignment, she said he appeared "very nervous, very distressed,
frantic almost," a state she attributed in part to the security
precautions during transport from the prison to the courthouse, among
them hooding, shackling and ear protection to block out sound.
Paul ordered Lachelier to represent Qosi at any tribunal procedures he
boycotts.
Lachelier said she was uncomfortable with that order, given that he had
clearly rejected her.
She said she would have to consult with her bar association in
California for ethical guidance on what role she should play.
The trial process recognizes a defendant's right to represent himself
but insists that a lawyer take the lead in his defense if he is absent.
The issue of representing a defendant against his wishes surfaced in
several of the 10 cases of Guantanamo detainees charged with war crimes
under the previous process enacted by President Bush in November 2001
but struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in June 2006.
An act of Congress created the current system three months later, and
14 of the 280 terrorism suspects held here have since been charged with
war crimes or identified as likely to be charged soon.
Copyright 2008 Los Angeles Times