From the Los Angeles Times
Feuding between Iraqi army and police slows security turnover
Separated
by regional and tribal rifts, the two branches won't cooperate,
creating a stumbling block for the U.S. military's goal of transferring
responsibility to local forces.
By Tony Perry
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
February 5, 2008
RAWAH, IRAQ —
Outside a two-story building guarded by U.S. Marines in this Euphrates
River valley town is a sign that says, in Marine colors of scarlet and
gold, "Welcome to JCC," or the Joint Coordination Center.
The sign is misleading. Despite pleas from the Marines, the Iraqi
police and Iraqi army have refused to share the facility with each
other and merge their operations.
Separated by tribal and regional differences, and a personality clash
between top officers, the two branches of the Iraqi security forces
have largely refused to coordinate their activities.
For the Marines, the situation is a major stumbling block toward
their goal of turning security responsibility for Anbar province over
to Iraqis as quickly as possible.
"This is our way out," said Col. Patrick Malay, commander of the 5th
Marine Regiment. But for now, he said, the Marines are forced to serve
as a bridge between two feuding sides.
Rawah is not alone. Although there are areas in the province where the
Iraqi police and army are working well together -- Fallouja, for
example -- in many places they are not, U.S. officials say.
As his forces assume responsibility for a wide swath of Anbar province,
Malay has focused on getting the Iraqis to work together.
In Fallouja, his regimental predecessor, Col. Lawrence Nicholson,
finally used a line from the Nike commercial in telling the Iraqis to
stop feuding and start cooperating: Just do it.
"It's a struggle everywhere," Malay said.
In Rawah (population 18,000), the idea of cooperation has proved a
particularly hard sell, although there has been progress.
The area is home to a large number of retired Baathist government
officials who have an affinity for the army but an animosity toward the
police. In the era of Saddam Hussein, the army enjoyed greater status
and viewed local police as unprofessional.
Recently the Iraqi police were given a radio by the Iraqi army to use
in communicating with their outposts -- a small but significant gesture
toward a cooperative approach.
"It's in their best interest to realize that, but it's just taking
time," said Capt. Adam Gross, who has been working for months to bring
the two sides together.
There have been some joint operations, including one that uncovered a
cache of Italian land mines. The Marines helped plan the mission but
then stood back and let the two Iraqi forces carry it out.
But overall, relations between the army and police remain chilly --
"challenging and distrustful," according to a Marine document.
Marines are concerned that if they leave prematurely, the army and
police would cease all cooperation and create a schism in the region
that could erupt into violence and allow insurgents to reassert control.
Asked about the rift, a young police officer at the Rawah compound said
of the Iraqi army, "They do not respect us. They think they know
everything."
But army Brig. Gen. Ayad Ismael complained that police units are often
staffed by untrained, undisciplined youths recruited by tribal sheiks.
"We are professionals. They are often not," he said.
Many of the police officers wear ski masks to hide their
identities, undercutting their credibility with the army and the public.
A recent incident may also have turned the local populace against
the police. An Iraqi police officer shot and killed a suspect fleeing
from a checkpoint. That night, a police outpost was bombed.
Last month, Maj. Gen. Walter Gaskin, the top Marine in Iraq, predicted
that the Marines could turn over security responsibility to the Iraqis
in Anbar province by March. Other U.S. military officials quickly
backed off that optimistic assessment, noting that it depended on
"conditions on the ground."
Maj. Gen. John Kelly, who will soon relieve Gaskin, has declined to set
a timeline, saying only that Marines are determined "to work ourselves
out of a job."
Rawah is a small town, but it is located near a major bridge that
Marines want to protect from insurgents. A break between the army and
police could embolden the insurgents to attempt to return here as well
as to other communities.
There are other challenges here. The local judge will not hear criminal
cases and has encouraged defendants to plead insanity to avoid
punishment. More police officers are needed for the region.
The Marines, backed by a cadre of retired U.S. police officers working
as consultants, want the Iraqi police to learn the "protect and serve"
philosophy rather than acting as a paramilitary force that specializes
in forced-entry raids.
"The cop-on-the-street kind of patrolling is not what they're doing,"
said Gross, "but it's what they need to do."
Although overcoming the split between the army and police may appear
daunting, Marines say a good deal has been accomplished in two years.
What started as unilateral U.S. patrols later became U.S. patrols with
the Iraqis tagging along. Now many patrols are done by the Iraqis, with
the U.S. in "over-watch" mode, ready to react.
"We were the face [of security] when we got here," Gross said. "They're
the face now."
Copyright 2008 Los Angeles Times