From the Los Angeles Times
In Darfur, another obstacle to peace
Chadian
Arabs are crossing into Sudan, settling in areas razed or abandoned
amid conflict. Some see an 'Arabization' plan by Khartoum.
By Edmund Sanders
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
August 12, 2007
TULUS, Sudan — Three years after it was burned to the ground, the
village of Tulus in Darfur is springing back to life.
Corn and sesame sprout from fertile fields. Children play around newly
built huts. Smoke from cooking fires once again rises from the land.
Problem is, those rebuilding Tulus are not the original inhabitants,
who were chased away by pro-government Sudanese militias in 2004 and
are afraid to return. Instead, their place has been taken by Chadian
Arabs, who recently crossed the border to flee violence in their own
country.
"It's comfortable here," said Sheik Algooni Mohammed Zeean, 42, leader
of 150 Chadian Arabs who in March settled on a grassy plain not far
from the ruins of Tulus' abandoned homes and school. Gesturing toward
the fields bearing their first harvest in Sudan, he smiled. "I feel
like this is my home now."
Over the last six months, nearly 30,000 Chadian Arabs have crossed into
Sudan, many of them settling on land owned by Darfur's pastoral tribes
that have been driven into displacement camps, aid groups say.
This migration has quickly become the latest obstacle to peace in
western Sudan, drawing the attention of international observers and
protests from those displaced from Darfur, who accuse the Sudanese
government of orchestrating an "Arabization" scheme by repopulating
their burned-out villages with foreigners.
"This is a government plot to give our land to Chadian Arabs," said
Mohammed Abakar Mohammed Adam, 27, a farmer from the village of
Bechabecha, which he said was abandoned after armed nomadic tribes
known asjanjaweed,
widely believed to be backed by the government, attacked in 2003. But
in recent months, Chadian newcomers have begun building homes atop the
remains.
The Darfur conflict began in early 2003 when rebels attacked government
forces to protest the poor resources and services in the neglected
area. The regime in Khartoum, dominated by Sudanese Arabs, is accused
of stirring up ethnic hatred by arming militias to attack villages that
supported the rebels, many of whom increasingly call themselves
"Africans." U.S. officials have labeled the government's campaign
genocide. An estimated 200,000 people have died, mostly from disease
and hunger in the early days of the crisis.
The recent influx of Chadian Arabs reflects the conflict's spread over
the border, where similar clashes based on ethnic differences are
destabilizing eastern Chad. Over the last year, nearly 50,000 Chadian
refugees have sought shelter in Darfur, though most of the earlier
arrivals were not Arab and settled in refugee camps.
Government officials in Khartoum have said little publicly about the
recent influx.Sudanese Arab leaders in West Darfur are welcoming the
Chadian Arabs, directing themto the vacated land and assisting them
with food and supplies. They insist they are simply helping their Arab
brethren at a time of crisis and that the newcomers will return to Chad
as soon as it's safe.
But for some displaced Tulus villagers, now living less than 20 miles
away in Habillah, news that strangers are cultivating their land has
brought suspicion and anguish.
"That is our land," said Miriam Yahya Ahmed, a 60-year-old widow with
four adult children. "Those people should go."
In Tulus, she lived on a small farm with fields of corn and peanuts.
Now, the hunched, gray-haired woman struggles to nurture a few dozen
corn stalks on a dirt patch behind her straw hut. International
humanitarian groups worry that disputes over the land might reignite
violence in western Darfur and lead to further delays in resolving the
region's massive displacement crisis, with more than 2 million people
driven from their homes.
"The mere presence of people on this land will make it more difficult
for [displaced persons] to return home," said Ita Schuette, head of the
Habillah branch of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner
for Refugees, the world body's refugee agency, which has been
monitoring the influx.
Tensions have been heightened by rumors that some Chadians have been
offered Sudanese identification cards or papers to help them establish
citizenship. One Darfur hospital was reportedly asked to forge 100
birth certificates, according to a U.N. official. In another reported
case, Chadians were allegedly photographed for ID cards in the city of
Foro Burunga.
U.N. officials have been unable to confirm those reports and said they
have found no ID cards or evidence that the government was plotting to
get Chadians to immigrate. After interviewing hundreds of Chadians, the
agency has concluded that many are entitled to refugee status because
of the violence in their home country.
But leaders with the Sudan People's Liberation Movement, the former
rebel army in the south, lodged a complaint in parliament in May about
the Chadian migration. SPLM officials, who reached a power-sharing
agreement with Khartoum in 2005, fear that Chadians will be issued
fraudulent voting cards in an effort to sway the upcoming national
census or next year's presidential election.
Others worry that the presence of Chadian Arabs will draw attacks by
Darfur rebels and further destabilize the region.
West Darfur's Gov. Abu Gasim Imam, a former rebel commander whose group
signed last year's controversial peace deal with the government, said
he plans to dispatch about 1,000 troops to keep the peace. He expressed
solidarity with displaced Darfur residents and said the Chadians should
be relocated to refugee camps.
"We are very engaged in protecting the land for the original owners,"
Imam said. He said some Chadians might be legitimate refugees, but
suggested others had ulterior motives and might be working in
conjunction with Sudanese Arabs.
"This is not simply a refugee crisis," he said. "It's a strategic
attempt to occupy land."
U.N. officials are pressing leaders in Khartoum to publicly reaffirm
the property rights of the displaced. Under the 2006 Darfur peace
agreement, the government granted the right of return to those
displaced by violence, but an existing Sudanese law states that owners
lose their rights if they abandon land for more than a year.
The U.N. also wants the government to designate the Chadians as
refugees, which would allow them to be relocated to camps. Such a move
might also alleviate citizenship concerns, since it would be difficult
for people registered as Chadian refugees to later claim they are
Sudanese.
The majority of Chadian Arabs have rejected offers of humanitarian aid
and efforts to relocate them to camps, saying they brought most of
their belongings with them, including food, seeds, tents and herds.
"For those who need help, we are giving out of our own pockets," said
Al Hadi Ahmed Shineibat, a Sudanese Arab sheik who has been assisting
Chadian arrivals asthey cross the border. Shineibat is the brother of
Abdullah abu Shineibat, an alleged janjaweed leader
cited by the State Department for attacks against Darfur villages in
2003 and 2004. Last year, Human Rights Watch accused Abdullah abu
Shineibatof launching attacks in eastern Chad.
Ahmed Shineibat and other Sudanese Arab sheiks appear to be taking the
lead role in assigning Chadian arrivals to disputed land in Darfur. In
some cases, they have sent trucks to transport newly arrived Chadians
to their assigned land. Some are also charging rent, even though they
do not own the land.
So far, the influx of Chadians has avoided problems usually associated
with sudden, conflict-driven displacements, such as food shortages or
overcrowding. "It appears to be very well organized," Schuette, the
U.N. official, said.
Resting under a tree in his home village of Um Samgamti, Ahmed
Shineibat dismissed claims that the Chadian migration was part of a
government-organized land grab. He predicted most Chadians would return
as soon as it was safe.
"We told them when they first arrived that when the owners of the land
return, they will have to leave," Shineibat said. "The land is not
being occupied. It's just being used temporarily by guests. They are
not Sudanese. So eventually they will have to leave."
He said Chad and Sudan have a long history of cross-border migrations
and land sharing, particularly during periods of strife, and that land
is traditionally returned to the original owners.
Despite his assurances, some Chadian Arabs appear to be digging in
their heels. A group of about 300 who arrived in Tulus before the most
recent wave initially identified themselves to U.N. interviewers as
Chadian. Earlier this month, their sheik changed his story, claiming
the group was from Darfur.
"We're Sudanese," said Sheik Ismail Mohammed Shein, 57. "This is our
land. We are not leaving."
He claimed to have a government ID card to prove his assertion, but
declined to show it.
A few miles away, those who arrived more recently with Zeean take a
more conciliatory approach. They say they were chased from their
village by Chadian soldiers and walked seven days with only what they
could carry on their backs.
At first, the group's leader feigned ignorance about the original
inhabitants of Tulus, saying he assumed the land was abandoned. Later
Zeean acknowledged he was aware of the controversy over their arrival
and the fears of the former residents. He vowed to leave the land if
the owners returned.
"Our land in Chad is better anyway," he said.
Asked what he would do if he returned home to find strangers occupying
his property, Zeean didn't hesitate: "I'd tell them to leave," he said.
"That's my land."
Copyright 2007 Los Angeles Times