From the Los Angeles Times
This is your brain on love
When you're attracted to someone, is your
gray matter talking sense -- or just hooked? Scientists take a rational
look.
By Susan Brink
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
July 30, 2007
Her front brain is telling her he's trouble. Look at the facts, it
says. He's never made a commitment, he drinks too much, he can't hold
down a job.
But her middle brain won't listen. Man, it swoons, he looks great in
those jeans, his black hair curls onto his forehead so adorably, and
when he drags on a cigarette, he's so bad he's good.
His front brain is lecturing, too: She's flirting with every guy in the
place, and she can drink even you under the table, it says.
His mid-brain is unresponsive, distracted by her legs, her blouse and
her come-hither stare.
"What could you be thinking?" their front brains demand.
Their middle brains, each on a quest for reward, pay no heed.
Alas, when it comes to choosing mates, smart neurons can make dumb
choices. Sure, if the brain's owner is in her 40s and has been around
the block a few times, she might grab her bag and scram. If the guy has
reached seasoned middle age, he might think twice about that
cleavage-baring temptress. Wisdom -- at least a little -- does come
with experience.
But if the objects of desire are in their 20s, all bets are off. A lot
will depend on the influence of Mom and Dad's marriage, the gossip and
urgings of friends, and whether life experience has convinced these two
brains that what they're looking at is attractive. She just might sidle
over to Mr. Wrong and bat her eyes. And he could well give in to
temptation.
And so the dance of attraction, infatuation and ultimately love begins.
It's a dance that holds many mysteries, to psychologists as well as to
the willing participants. Science is just beginning to parse the inner
workings of the brain in love, examining the blissful or ruinous fall
from a medley of perspectives: neural systems, chemical messengers and
the biology of reward.
It was only in 2000 that two London scientists selected 70 people, all
in the early sizzle of love, and rolled them into the giant cylinder of
a functional magnetic resonance imaging scanner, or fMRI. The images
they got are thought to be science's first pictures of the brain in
love.
The pictures were a revelation, and others have followed, showing that
romantic love is a lot like addiction to alcohol or drugs. The brain is
playing a trick, necessary for evolution, by associating something that
just happened with pleasure and attributing the feeling to that
magnificent specimen right before your eyes.
All animals mate: The most primitive system in the brain, one that even
reptiles have, knows it needs to reproduce. Turtles do it but then lay
their eggs in the sand and head back to sea, never seeing their mate
again.
Human brains are considerably more complicated, with additional neural
systems that seek romance, others that want comfort and companionship,
and others that are just out for a roll in the hay.
Yet the chemistry between two people isn't just a matter of molecules
careening around the brain, dictating feelings like some game of
neuro-billiards. Attraction also involves personal history. "Our
parents have an effect on us," says Helen Fisher, evolutionary
anthropologist at Rutgers University who studies human attraction. "So
does the school system, television, timing, mystery."
Every book ever read, and every movie ever wept through, starts
charting a course toward the chosen one.
The love dance
"Love," that one small word,
stands for a hodgepodge of feelings and drives: lust, romance, passion,
attachment, commitment and contentment. Studying this brew is made
harder because the pathways aren't totally distinct. Lust and romance,
for example, have some overlapping biology, even though they are not
the same thing.
Similarly, the dance that leads, if we're lucky, to a stable commitment
moves through several key steps.
First comes initial attraction, the spark. If someone's going to pick
one person out of the billions of opposite-sex humans out there, it's
this step that starts things rolling.
Next comes the wild, dizzying infatuation of romance -- a unique magic
between two people who can't stop thinking about each other. The brain
uses its chemical arsenal to focus our attention on one person,
forsaking all others.
"Everyone knows what that feels like. This is one of the great
mysteries. It's the love potion No. 9, the click factor, interpersonal
chemistry," says Gian Gonzaga, senior research scientist at eHarmony
Labs.
The passion lasts at least for a few months, two to four years tops,
says relationship researcher Arthur Aron, psychologist at the State
University of New York at Stony Brook.
As it fades, something more stable takes over: the steady pair-bonding
of what's called companionate love. It's a heartier variety,
characterized by tenderness, affection and stability over the long
haul. Far less is known about the brains of people celebrating their
silver anniversaries or more, but researchers are beginning to recruit
such couples to find out.
When Kelly and Robert Iblings of Calabasas had their first face-to-face
meeting after a month of corresponding online, all signs of a spark
were there. Kelly, 30, recalls thinking "Wow!" Robert, 33, thought
Kelly was beautiful. "I love his height," Kelly says of Robert's
6-foot-4 frame. "And those eyes. He's quite handsome. I mean, look at
him. He's cute. He's hot."
"She's very cute," Robert says. "And I like the way she laughs."
Their brains' signals were in sync, and it was good.
It probably didn't hurt that they were a little bit nervous about
meeting each other.
For years, scientists have known that attraction is more likely to
happen when people are aroused, be it through laughter, anxiety or
fear. Aron tested that theory in 1974 on the gorgeous but
spine-chilling heights of the Capilano Canyon Suspension Bridge in
Vancouver, British Columbia -- a 5-foot wide, 450-foot, wobbly, swaying
length of wooden slats and wire cable suspended 230 feet above rocks
and shallow rapids.
His research team waited as unsuspecting men, between ages 18 and 35
and unaccompanied by women, crossed over. About halfway across the
bridge, each man ran into an attractive young woman claiming to be
doing research on beautiful places. She asked him a few questions and
gave him her phone number in case he had follow-up questions.
The experiment was repeated upriver on a bridge that was wide and
sturdy and only 10 feet above a small rivulet. The same attractive coed
met the men, brandishing the same questionnaire.
The result? Men crossing the scary bridge rated the woman on the
Capilano bridge more attractive. And about half the men who met her
called her afterward. Only two of 16 men on the stable bridge called.
Fear got their attention and aroused emotional centers in the brain.
"People are more likely to feel aroused in a scary setting," Aron says.
"It's pretty simple. You're feeling physiologically aroused, and it's
ambiguous why. Then you see an attractive person, and you think, 'Oh,
that's why.' "
In a laboratory, Aron tested his arousal theory further by having
people run in place for 10 minutes, and compared them with people who
didn't run. Those who had exercised were more attracted to good-looking
people in photographs than those who had been sedentary.
Any kind of physiological arousal would probably do the trick, Aron
concludes from his studies. Couples who ride roller coasters, laugh at
a really funny comedian or escape a burning building together get an
emotional jolt and could attribute the feeling to the attractiveness of
the other.
The forces of attraction are in many ways mysterious, but scientists
know certain things. Studies have shown that women prefer men with
symmetrical faces and that men like a certain waist-to-hip ratio in
their mates. One study even found that women, when they sniffed men's
T-shirts, were attracted to certain kinds of body odors.
That initial spark can flash and fade. Or it can become a flame and
then a fire, a rush of exhilaration, yearning, hunger and sense of
complete union that scientists know as passionate love.
Key to this state of seeing a person as a soul mate instead of a
one-night stand is the limbic system, nestled deep within the brain
between the neocortex (the region responsible for reason and intellect)
and the reptilian brain (responsible for primitive instincts). Altered
levels of dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin -- neurotransmitters
also associated with arousal -- wield their influence.
But passionate love is something far stronger than that first sizzle of
chemistry. "It's a drive to win life's greatest prize, the right mating
partner," Fisher says. It is also, she adds, an addiction.
People in the early throes of passionate love, she says, can think of
little else. They describe sleeplessness, loss of appetite, feelings of
euphoria, and they're willing to take exceptional risks for the loved
one.
Brain areas governing reward, craving, obsession, recklessness and
habit all play their part in the trickery.
In an experiment published as a chapter in a 2006 book, "Evolutionary
Cognitive Neuroscience," Fisher found 17 people who were in
relationships for an average of seven months. She knew they were in
love from their answers to what researchers call the Passionate Love
Scale. They all said they'd feel deep despair if their lover left, and
they yearned to know all there was to know about the loved one.
She put these lovesick, enraptured people in an fMRI to see what areas
of their brains got active when they saw a photograph of their beloved
ones.
"We found some remarkable things," she said. "We saw activity in the
ventral tegmental area and other regions of the brain's reward system
associated with motivation, elation and focused attention." It's the
same part of the brain that presumably is active when a smoker reaches
for a cigarette or when gamblers think they're going to win the
lottery. No wonder it's as hard to say no to the feeling of romantic
arousal as it would be to say no to a windfall in the millions. The
brain has seen what it wants, and it's going to get it.
"At that point, you really wouldn't notice if he had three heads,"
Fisher says. "Or you'd notice, but you'd choose to overlook it."
Other studies also suggest that the brain in the first throes of love
is much like a brain on drugs.
Lucy Brown, professor of neuroscience at the Albert Einstein College of
Medicine, has also taken fMRI images of people in the early days of a
new love. In a study reported in the July 2005, Journal of
Neurophysiology, she too found key activity in the ventral tegmental
area. "That's the area that's also active when a cocaine addict gets an
IV injection of cocaine," Brown says. "It's not a craving. It's a high."
You see someone, you click, and you're euphoric. And in response, your
ventral tegmental area uses chemical messengers such as dopamine,
serotonin and oxytocin to send signals racing to a part of the brain
called the nucleus accumbens with the good news, telling it to start
craving.
"The other person becomes a goal in your life," Brown says. He or she
becomes a goal you might die without and would pack up and move across
the country for. That one person begins to stand out as the one and
only.
Biologically, the cravings and pleasure unleashed are as strong as any
drug. Surely such a goal is worth taking risks for, and other
alterations in the brain help ensure that the lovelorn will do just
that. Certain regions, scientists have found, are being deactivated,
such as within the amygdala, associated with fear. "That's why you can
do such insane things when you're in love," Fisher says. "You would
never otherwise dream of driving across the country in 13 hours, but
for love, you would."
Sooner or later, excited brain messages reach the caudate nucleus, a
dopamine-rich area where unconscious habits and skills, such as the
ability to ride a bike, are stored.
The attraction signal turns the love object into a habit, and then an
obsession. According to a 1999 study in the journal Psychological
Medicine, people newly in love have serotonin levels 40% lower than
normal people do -- just like people with obsessive-compulsive
disorders.
Experiments in other mammals add to the human chemical findings. Female
prairie voles, for example, develop a distinct preference for a
specific male after mating, and the preference is associated with a 50%
increase in dopamine in the nucleus accumbens.
But when the monogamous vole is injected with a dopamine antagonist,
blocking the activity of the chemical, she'll readily dump her partner
for another.
Using their heads
Kelly and Robert Iblings, now
married for nine months, are fascinated by all this talk of nucleus
accumbens, addiction and primitive mating instincts. Sure, they admit,
they found each other attractive. But they were also making use of
their front brains' sharp thinking skills. They were remembering
painful past lessons and looking for signs of compatibility.
They had each survived an earlier, failed engagement, and they knew
what they were looking for this time around. They were listening to
their front brains as they told them to look for compatibility,
stability, shared values and commitment.
From their first e-mail exchanges through eHarmony, an Internet dating
service, the Iblings each felt they had found a unique mate. She liked
to travel. So did he. They both love books and learning, have similar
religious beliefs and come from loving, intact families. She no sooner
sent an e-mail telling him about an exhibit she saw on a business trip
to New York than he sent a message back telling her he knew of the
exhibit because he had bought a book on it the day before.
Coincidence, or soul mate?
The front brain certainly gets involved as it ponders all of life's
experiences and past mistakes, researchers say -- but not just the
front brain. The nucleus accumbens, virtual swamp of dopamine that it
is, is also holder of memories. Its quest for reward is influenced by
childhood experiences, friends, previous failed engagements or the jerk
who cheated on you. The sum of those experiences make some people
attracted to a prince or a frog, a princess or a shrew.
And, as it happens, practical matters such as whether a couple both
like piña coladas and getting caught in the rain do matter in
igniting
passionate love.
A research project headed by eHarmony Labs' Gonzaga interviewed 1,200
dating and newlywed couples. The results, reported in the July issue of
the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, found that those who
reported similar interests and feelings were more satisfied. "Those who
reported chemistry said they felt at ease, relaxed, connected. They
knew they had some things in common," he says. "Chemistry is more than
just being hot or handsome."
Clearly, in the matters of love, the stars were aligned for the
Iblings. When they met, they were ready for each other. But they were
also attracted to each other. The chemistry was there. Most
relationship researchers think it has to be.
They had what it took to kick-start the relationship with an undeniable
urgency, allowing two people to give up the candy store of other
choices and commit to each other.
Odds are that in two to four years, this urgency will fade -- and the
couple will, if all goes well, settle in for the long haul with
companionate love. Such peoples' lives are entwined, as are their
property and bank accounts, and they begin to answer questionnaires
differently. The rush and the urgency is gone, but they feel committed,
emotionally close and stable.
It is the state that many desire, yet it is the least studied. There's
a reason for that. Most studies of couples are of college students and
young newlyweds.
Brown, however, has recently recruited volunteers for a study of people
40 to 65 who have been together for many years. She'll put them in
fMRIs to see where love resides after the urgency fades. "It's unknown,
the extent to which these original brain motivations are still active,"
she says. "Or whether companionate love has turned more cortical, more
conscious thinking, more evaluative." Her first volunteers had their
brains scanned this month.
The free fall of love's first rush can happen at any age, whether
people are 20 or 70, says Elaine Hatfield, psychology professor at the
University of Hawaii and relationship researcher.
What differs is that the older people get, the more memories they
harbor of joy and trust, rejection and disappointment. And as people
learn from experience, the front brain, with its logic and reason,
probably gets a greater say.
"When you are young, passion and hope are so strong that's it's almost
impossible to stop loving someone," Hatfield says. "After you've been
kicked around by life, however, you start to have a dual response to
handsome con men: 'Wow!' and 'Arrrrrrgh!'
"It takes not will power but painful experience to make us wise."
Somehow, it all comes together, for better or for worse, the sum total
of what's found in the mating dance of the ancient reptilian brain, the
passion of the limbic brain and the logic of the neocortex.
Oh, what a ride.
Copyright 2007 Los Angeles Times