Reid says troop surge OK, but only for a few months
From the Associated Press
8:57 AM PST, December 17, 2006
WASHINGTON —
Incoming Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Sunday he would support
a temporary troop increase in Iraq only if it were part of a broader
strategy to bring combat forces home by early 2008.
"If the commanders on the ground said this is just for a short period
of time, we'll go along with that," said Reid, D-Nev., citing a time
frame such as two months to three months. But a period longer than
that, such as 18 months to 24 months, would be unacceptable, he said.
"The American people will not allow this war to go on as it has. It
simply is a war that will not be won militarily. It can only be won
politically," Reid said. "We have to change course in Iraq."
President Bush is considering several options for a new strategy in
Iraq, such as a proposal backed by Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and
Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., that would send tens of thousands of
additional troops for an indefinite period to quickly secure Baghdad.
There are about 134,000 U.S. troops in Iraq now.
That plan would run counter to recommendations by the bipartisan Iraq
Study Group, which set a goal of withdrawing combat troops by early
2008 in support of more aggressive regional diplomacy.
Retired Gen. Jack Keane, a former Army vice chief of staff who is
advising Bush to send an additional 30,000 to 40,000 U.S. troops, said
it would take at least 1 1/2 years to secure Iraq.
"It's impossible," Keane said, responding to Reid's suggestion that the
troop surge be limited to two months to three months.
"It will take a couple of months just to get forces in," he said.
Bush's former secretary of state, Colin Powell, said he was skeptical
that any type of troop surge would be effective, noting that ultimately
it is the Iraqis who must stand up and stop their growing sectarian
violence.
"It is the D.C. police force that guards Washington, D.C., not the
troops that are stationed at Fort Myer. And in Baghdad, you need a
police force to do that," Powell said. "So, before I would add any
additional troops or recommend it to a commander in chief, I'd want to
make sure we have a clear understanding of what it is they're going
for, how long they're going for."
Democratic Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts, who is on the Senate
Armed Services Committee, said there would be widespread opposition by
members of his committee if Bush proposes a troop increase.
"We have to understand that there is absolute chaos that is taking
place there. This country is falling apart," Kennedy said.
Regarding a temporary troop surge, Kennedy said, "I respect Harry Reid
on it, but that's not where I am."
Reid and Keane spoke on ABC's "This Week," Kennedy appeared on "Fox
News Sunday," and Powell spoke on CBS' "Face the Nation."
Copyright 2006 Los Angeles Times