N. Korea Threat Lies in Nuclear Sales
U.S.
intelligence officials and weapons experts say the possible export of
atomic material and know-how is a greater concern than an attack.
By Greg Miller
Times Staff Writer
October 21, 2006
WASHINGTON — U.S. intelligence officials and weapons proliferation
experts say they are concerned that North Korea could add plutonium to
the extensive inventory of arms components and technologies it already
has sold to such nations as Syria, Pakistan and Libya.
Because
of North Korea's track record as an eager exporter of weaponry, some
experts are more worried about the government in Pyongyang spreading
nuclear technology to other "rogue" nations than about the possibility
of it launching a nuclear attack.
"Iran having nuclear weapons
is a threat," said David Albright, a former weapons inspector and
current president of the Institute for Science and International
Security in Washington.
"It's hard to articulate that North Korea having nuclear weapons is a
threat to anybody, except by selling it."
That
concern prompted a warning from President Bush on Wednesday that
Pyongyang would face a "grave consequence" if caught trying to sell
plutonium or nuclear weapons to "rogue" nations or terrorist groups.
Albright
and other experts, as well as American intelligence officials, said
they had not seen evidence that North Korea was attempting to sell the
nuclear technology it demonstrated in an underground explosion Oct. 9.
Doing so, they said, would be an extreme and dangerous step even for
one of the world's most defiant regimes.
But the combination of
North Korea's newly demonstrated capability and its long history of
selling arms has refocused international attention on the nuclear
proliferation threat.
"I don't think you'll find guys saying
they've got devices ready to sell off the shelf," said a U.S.
intelligence official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of
the classified nature of the subject. "I think the concern would be
about components and raw material."
Tracking North Korea's weapons programs and shipments has been a major
priority for U.S. intelligence agencies.
Last
year, American intelligence analysts concluded that samples of
processed uranium surrendered by Libya probably had come from North
Korea. Libya turned over the materials when it agreed in 2003 to
abandon its illegal weapons programs.
Pyongyang has a more extensive and established record as an exporter of
conventional missile components.
A
study by the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies
says North Korea had sold "several hundred" mid-range ballistic
missiles "as well as materials, equipment, components and production
technology" to countries that include Egypt, Iran, Libya, Pakistan,
Syria and Yemen. Most of the exported missiles have been variants of
the Scud design the Soviets first sold to North Korea in the late
1960s, the study says.
Over a two-decade period, sales of
missiles and components have brought in revenue of several hundred
million dollars, "a significant portion of North Korea's hard currency
earnings," the study says.
North Korea is an impoverished
country that relies on China for much of its food, and it depends on
the sale of weapons and contraband, allegedly including counterfeit
U.S. currency, for much of its revenue.
North Korea is
believed to have engaged in barter arrangements by which it has
provided missiles to Iran in exchange for oil. Of greater concern has
been an apparent deal with Pakistan begun in 1997 by which North Korea
provided missile components and technology in return for expertise on
developing a uranium enrichment program — a means of producing
weapons-grade nuclear material that is more difficult to detect than
the reprocessing of plutonium.
Numerous North Korean weapons
shipments have been intercepted. In 1996, Swiss authorities stopped a
consignment of Scud missile components headed to Egypt, prompting Cairo
to promise to curtail its purchases from North Korea.
Given
North Korea's record, its nuclear test has triggered fears that it may
next seek to export such weapons technology as well.
As
recently as several years ago, American intelligence agencies concluded
that North Korea probably had enough plutonium for two or three bombs.
But in December 2002, North Korea expelled international inspectors,
soon thereafter withdrew from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and
subsequently declared that it was resuming the reprocessing of more
than 8,000 spent fuel rods.
"They have certainly produced enough
plutonium since that time to make a number of more weapons," said a
U.S. defense official familiar with the intelligence on North Korea.
It
is unclear whether Pyongyang plans further nuclear tests. American spy
satellites and other surveillance have detected suspicious activity at
other underground facilities, possibly indicating preparations for
another test, U.S. intelligence officials said. However, South Korean
and Japanese media reported Friday that North Korean leader Kim Jong Il
had told a Chinese envoy that Pyongyang would not conduct another test.
Experts
said that further tests would suggest that North Korea has an ample
supply of plutonium, enough to make additional bombs and raise concerns
about proliferation.
Recent sanctions imposed by the United
Nations bar North Korea from spreading nuclear material or technology.
And most experts said the country would probably refrain from doing so.
"It's still a low-probability worry," said Michael Levi, a nuclear
weapons expert at the Council on Foreign Relations, "but it's the high
consequences that make people concerned."
greg.miller@latimes.com
*
(INFOBOX BELOW)
A history of arms exports
Here are some of the transfers of weapons and related materials from
North Korea to other countries:
Egypt
• Bought Scud-B missiles in 1980s
• Bought Scud-C throughout 1990s
• Negotiated for Nodong missiles in 2000, but U.S. diplomatic
intervention blocked transfer
Iran
• Had Scud-B missiles and mobile launchers shipped in 1987
for Iran-Iraq war
• Received Scud-C missiles in early 1990s
• Began to have Nodong missiles shipped in 1995
• May have received advanced Taepodong technology
Pakistan
• Reportedly agreed around 1997 to trade uranium enrichment
technology for Nodong missiles and production technology
• Arranged for missile components and technicians to be
transported by aircraft from North Korea in late 1997
• Tested version of Nodong in April 1998
Syria
• Reports of negotiations surfaced in 1989
• Received Scud-C missiles in 1990s
• Few reports of substantial sales since 1990s, perhaps because
Syria and Iran developed missile cooperation
Libya
•
Ship destined for Libya carrying Scud missile materials, components and
blueprints intercepted June 1999 by Indian customs officials
• Unconfirmed reports of purchases of Nodong missiles or
components since 2000
• U.S. intelligence analyzed Libyan-processed uranium after
December 2003 and concluded it came from North Korea
United Arab Emirates, Yemen
• Minor purchases of Scud missiles during 1990s
• North Korean ship carrying 15 Scud missiles for Yemen
temporarily detained in December 2002
Source: "North Korea's Weapons Programs — A Net Assessment,"
International Institute for Strategic Studies
Copyright 2006 Los Angeles Times