From the Los Angeles Times
Who's really locked up in Guantanamo?
By Tom Malinowski
TOM MALINOWSKI is Washington advocacy director of Human Rights Watch.
March 16, 2006
BY NOW, just about every American ally in the world has said the United
States should close its detention camp at Guantanamo Bay. God forbid,
responds President Bush, for the camp holds terrorists caught on the
battlefield fighting the U.S. and who would kill again the moment they
are released.
Yet
it's an open secret that the administration itself is trying to make
Guantanamo go away by releasing some prisoners and shipping the rest to
other countries. What the administration has resisted with real fury
are not the calls to close the camp but those to open it — through the
release of information and the scrutiny of courts.
The reason
may be that the more that is learned about these prisoners, the more
holes appear in the president's narrative of a tough and triumphant
fight against Al Qaeda. Instead, when the full story is told,
Guantanamo may come to stand as much for incompetence as it does for
injustice.
Last week, under court order, the Pentagon released
the transcripts of several hundred hearings held to decide whether
Guantanamo prisoners were in fact "enemy combatants." Classified
evidence was deleted, but what emerges is how insignificant most of
these prisoners are. Fewer than half were caught on battlefields in
Afghanistan or by U.S. troops. A majority were turned over by Pakistan
(often for cash bounties). Few "combatants" are even accused of having
fought. Many are held simply because they were living in a house
associated with the Taliban or working for a charity linked to the
group.
It seems that U.S. forces, inundated by thousands of
captives after the Afghan war, didn't have enough experienced
interrogators and interpreters to sort out the actual terrorists from
Arabs unaffiliated with Al Qaeda. But they were under pressure to get
results and unwilling to believe that their Pakistani allies could
deceive them. Prisoners who claimed to know nothing were subjected to
increasingly brutal treatment until some confessed or accused others.
According
to Pentagon documents, Mohammed Al-Qahtani, the alleged 20th 9/11
hijacker, accused 30 fellow prisoners of being Osama bin Laden's
bodyguards — after Qahtani was tormented by weeks of sleep deprivation,
isolation and sexual humiliation. That the Pentagon finds confessions
obtained this way credible is, well, incredible. How many false leads
has it chased, and how much lifesaving intelligence has been lost?
What
the administration doesn't want to face is that, as the small fish were
taken to Cuba, Pakistan arranged escape routes from Afghanistan for
more dangerous jihadists — presumably those with cash or connections to
Pakistani intelligence services — including several hundred flown out
of the city of Kunduz before it fell to U.S. forces. The Pakistani
military maintains close links with Al Qaeda-linked militant groups
created to wage war in Kashmir and Afghanistan, and the Taliban
continues to hold sway over Pakistan's tribal areas on the Afghan
border. Bush should devote the resources needed to stabilize
Afghanistan and tell Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf to end,
finally, the military-Islamist alliance that has made his country the
new home base for Al Qaeda and the Taliban.
In the meantime, here's the score: the
U.S. got Guantanamo, the Pakistanis got paid and Al Qaeda and the
Taliban mostly got away. Michael Scheuer, the former head of the CIA's
Bin Laden unit, recently told the National Journal that less than 10%
of Guantanamo prisoners are high-value Al Qaeda operatives with any
knowledge of terrorism. Of those turned over by Pakistan, he said: "We
absolutely got the wrong people."
That doesn't mean the camp's
prisoners are all innocent farmers. Even if they weren't fighting the
U.S., many went to Afghanistan to help the Taliban build its "pure"
Islamic state — precisely the kind of men Al Qaeda tries to recruit as
cannon fodder. Some could become killers if released. But does that
make them different from hundreds of thousands of other angry young men
throughout the Muslim world who believe in the same cause? There is no
shortage of potential suicide bombers. Guantanamo does nothing to solve
that problem. It probably makes it worse.
Copyright 2006 Los Angeles Times